Re: New light shed on supposed blind "abnormality"

From: Brian Buhrow (buhrow@lothlorien.nfbcal.org)
Date: Tue Jan 20 1998 - 07:00:49 PST


        Actually, I'd be interested in knowing what they do with subjectswho
where long pants all day and subjects who are amputees. My guess is that
if light is not necessarily absorbed through the eyes, then it is not
necessarily absorbed through one place on the backs of the knees. What
about the nape of the neck, crook of the elbow, or any other place that is
regularly exposed to daylight, room light, etc.
-Brian

On Jan 17, 11:44pm, David Andrews wrote:
} Subject: Re: New light shed on supposed blind "abnormality"
} Brian:
}
} Keep us posted on this one, if you see anything else. It is interesting in
} and of itself, even more so when you consider possible blindness
} connections...
}
} DA
}
}
}
}
}
} David Andrews, dandrews@visi.com or
} Telnet to nfbnet.org, or call
} (612) 696-1975
>-- End of excerpt from David Andrews



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 02 2012 - 01:30:04 PST