I agree with Mike Freeman, but would point out that it was David Andrews who
sent the initial query regarding the merrits of the White House www server.
Just trying to avoid slander among the bits. :)
-Brian
On Oct 31, 9:37pm, Mike Freeman wrote:
} Subject: Re: White House on Worldwide Web
} Curtis Chong writes:
} >
} > I am interested in comments on the following post I received from
} > the BLIND-L list. Do people think Doug Wakefield is right on when
} > he says that the White House did something right? Or are we
} > looking at a form of elitism? What I mean by that is this: should
} > we be constrained, when accessing the White House data, to using
} > our own computers or should we begin pushing for equal access to
} > the public information kiosks that will doubtless proliferate.
} >
} Ultimately, we should have access to the public kiosks. However,
} I think the WWW server is a good start and merits our support
} and praise.
}
} Whether what's on the server is worth reading ... well, that's
} a separate issue not appropriate to this forum <grin>.
}
}
} --
} Mike Freeman | Internet: mikef@pacifier.com
} GEnie: M.FREEMAN11 | Amateur Radio Callsign: K7UIJ
} ... "To my embarassment, I was born in bed with a lady!" -- Wilson Misner
>-- End of excerpt from Mike Freeman
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 02 2012 - 01:30:03 PST